Forums  > General  > Decreasing forum activities  
     
Page 3 of 3Goto to page: 1, 2, [3] Prev
Display using:  

Jurassic


Total Posts: 218
Joined: Mar 2018
 
Posted: 2019-05-30 21:21
whilst I dont have any firsthand experience, I dont buy that all traders and quants must suck at sales.

deeds


Total Posts: 427
Joined: Dec 2008
 
Posted: 2019-05-30 22:24
@jurassic - from a formal perspective, interesting comment...on what do you base your opinion then?

Jurassic


Total Posts: 218
Joined: Mar 2018
 
Posted: 2019-05-30 22:43
the idea that good at maths = bad at social skills

deeds


Total Posts: 427
Joined: Dec 2008
 
Posted: 2019-05-30 22:47

seems possible to me that 'social skills' should be indexed to respect the full universe of reasonable possibilities...we typically use a chauvinistic (with respect to personality) concept (as with beauty or other similar consensual criteria)

That said, i'll bite...ever studied math at university? worked at a commercial firm where math, modeling and engineering were critical activities?

How did you form your opinion? As simple as proposed statement couldn't possibly be true in full generality?

Strange


Total Posts: 1543
Joined: Jun 2004
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 00:21
> That wasn't buyside me talking about sales who cover me. It was (former) sellside me talking about sales I worked with.

I was merely summing up my sell-side and buy-side experience. Over the last decade I have met only two salespeople that actually had a clue (both cases it was a "she" fwiw). My impression is that sales people self select somehow. I have met salespeople that have interesting macro ideas, but salespeople that actually have a technical understanding of the product are rare.

I don't interest myself in 'why?'. I think more often in terms of 'when?'...sometimes 'where?'. And always how much?'

tabris


Total Posts: 1261
Joined: Feb 2005
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 04:04
> I have met salespeople that have interesting macro ideas,

I don't think I ever met one that gave an original macro idea though... its usually a rebranded idea from another buyside firm

Dilbert: Why does it seem as though I am the only honest guy on earth? Dogbert: Your type tends not to reproduce.

ronin


Total Posts: 453
Joined: May 2006
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 09:23
> the idea that good at maths = bad at social skills

Sales isn't about social skills.

On every sales team there is one person who generates 90% of sales, one person who generates another 9%, and everybody else adds up to 1%.

The first one is usually some nerdy girl with teeth that stick out who never speaks to anybody. The second one is a weird guy who smells and who nobody wants to sit near. All the obvious sales-y people are the 1%.

"There is a SIX am?" -- Arthur

ronin


Total Posts: 453
Joined: May 2006
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 09:24
> I have met salespeople that have interesting macro ideas

Yes, that's when you have to be afraid. Very afraid.

"There is a SIX am?" -- Arthur

Jurassic


Total Posts: 218
Joined: Mar 2018
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 09:40
That said, i'll bite...ever studied math at university? worked at a commercial firm where math, modeling and engineering were critical activities?

@deeds all of the above

nikol


Total Posts: 703
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 11:31
LEH had top men and collapsed. Did they all have a clue? Yes. And still.
The idea that 5-15% interest at 10+ yr is sustainable annihilates all those compliments.
CORRECTED.

Strange


Total Posts: 1543
Joined: Jun 2004
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 21:25
> LH had top men and collapsed.

What's LH?

I don't interest myself in 'why?'. I think more often in terms of 'when?'...sometimes 'where?'. And always how much?'

nikol


Total Posts: 703
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2019-05-31 23:24
Deep apology for typo - LEH is an old ticket for Lehman Brothers.

ronin


Total Posts: 453
Joined: May 2006
 
Posted: 2019-06-05 15:56
So, observations.

Forum activities go up when we talk about salespeople.

Any mention of Lehman kills the forum stone dead.

"There is a SIX am?" -- Arthur

Kitno


Total Posts: 375
Joined: Mar 2005
 
Posted: 2019-06-05 23:54
1. Need for quants is down
2. Banking pays much less variable pay so competition is down
3. Innovation/risk/boundary pushing is the antithesis of remuneration structures now
4. You're all boring. Where's the brass in the chopper up to heli ski in the Urals these days?

"Yeh, after that blow out I bid the bonds at 76 and you hit man...You're 77/81 now? Cool man...What? Do I care at 80? No mate... I'm 73 bid now...I'm sure you didn't just load up just for me...".

nikol


Total Posts: 703
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2019-06-06 09:44
> 4. You're all boring

Yes, it must be chilling.

Many crazy funny geeks are in crypto now trying to make it faster without losing reliability. All this movement is a bit sectarian. Reminds me a bit the first christians meetings in caves. They believe Worship that the "bitcoin winter" is behind and pray that the new bubble (sorry, I must say the Sun) will emerge again from the debris.

> 1. Need for quants is down

It is all renamed Data scientist and, yes, it is cheaper.

PS. The news into my face now:
"Facebook will pay salaries in GlobalCoin, embraces Decentralization".
"Edgewater Markets Launches Institutional Crypto Trading Platform"
"Bitpanda to Launch a Global Platform for High-Volume Traders"
"Malaysian Financial Regulator Approves Three Crypto Exchanges"
etc.
There is a lot to do beyond paid jobs, 'secured nest' is over.
Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 3 of 3Goto to page: 1, 2, [3] Prev