 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Since there usually is not more than one book a year one wants to shout about so I'll won't specify a year this time. So far the winner is Liespotting by Pamela Anderson. (ehrm Meyer). Yes, I am a sucker who thought there is something useful to glean from it.
Apart from the howlers "The USA economy looses seven GDP percent annually from deception." But how much does it gain?
Eckman's lie detection rate is 95% That one is easy. What is the sure sign that salesman is lying? His lips are moving
And. My favourite Dilbertism:
"One way an auditor might suggest combating a Millennial's personal isolationism would be to encourage managers to help each team member to strategize a medium-term career development plan."
The book can be summarized in two paragraphs, nay, two words. "People lie".
There is nothing of a substance in there. Same old trite misconceptions. Money and time irretrievably lost.
"Allez, circulez, rien à voir ici."
|
вакансия "Программист Психологической службы"
-але! у нас ошибко! не работает бля-бля-бля
-вы хотите об этом поговорить? |
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Not one, but two. I mean I have read Drop Dead Healthy by A. J. Jacobs, thought WTF? then forgot and then read The Happiness Project by Gretchen Rubin. (Fool me twice...)
And these totally crappy books started me thinking.
Don't we have a case of cognitive dissonance here? When those books are positioned as written by totally average people who are looking for fulfilling one's life, AND live near Central Park in Manhattan?
If they were, say, engaging in some extreme activities and then writing down their experiences then it would be interesting.
But all Jacobs dares is to buy for 49.95$ a board to shit in crouching position and to meditate watching the sleep button of his iMac (he forgot to mention its price).
Gretchen, herself, is "alas, running pretty close to efficiency" and then promotes the singing in the toilet.
That's it.
Being so full of oneself and wanking in front of the mirror (AKA blogging) is it the disease of late 2010 or what?
And if you (like me) think that there just might be some usable info there, you will be disappointed, like I was.
|
вакансия "Программист Психологической службы"
-але! у нас ошибко! не работает бля-бля-бля
-вы хотите об этом поговорить? |
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
< Update > Guess, who is the dad-in-law of Gretchen Rubin? |
вакансия "Программист Психологической службы"
-але! у нас ошибко! не работает бля-бля-бля
-вы хотите об этом поговорить? |
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
And this year winner is Science delusion by Rupert Sheldrake The title resonates (alas not morphically) with some other title.
I don't recall precisely how I stumbled into this personage. (Either it was some talk "banned" by TED or unbanned Google talk).
The premise of the book is sort of nice. Those scientists draped in their ebony towels have lost the sense of reality, and most importantly, adventure.
They don't see what's happening under their own noses. And then it pours, the facts that science is unable to explain. Like that Indian woman (he got her name wrong, but totally) which substitutes on prana only. The mathematician with IQ of 126 and virtually no brain. ...
And everything is explainable by morphic fields.
It was entertaining at the beginning, and moreover, my credo is "know (the face of) thy enemy."
But, but. When the quick Google check amply demonstrates the shoddiness of his facts (he wasn't able even to get a name of Stentor roeseli right). When his rants are becoming a bit repetitive. When he gives a free will to the electrons...
Nah. Avoid.
BTW, the story with the woman feeding on prana. Some bastards made her vomit, and found some bits of popadum in there. Bon appétit!
|
вакансия "Программист Психологической службы"
-але! у нас ошибко! не работает бля-бля-бля
-вы хотите об этом поговорить? |
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
There was some masochistic pleasure in reading Pink's Drive. But I have decided to stop. Avoid by all means. Pop-psychology at it's worst. I should have suspected that much, when he quoted Maslow.
The summary: the new century brought Motivation 3.0 (internal motivation) Before that there was Motivation 2.0 (factory motivation since nineteenth century, i.e. cash incentives] And before that Motivation 1.0 (animal instincts, i.e. sex).
Thus all the creations of the past (books, drawings, games) are only illusions. Since the Drive book wasn't written yet. And thus the internal motivation couldn't happen.
The advice peddled is stolen from the immortal Dogbert's Top Secret Management Handbook --- You might be tempted to try to keep employees satisfied in order to maintain productivity. That's not easy. Employee satisfaction can be expensive, sometimes even unhygienic. There is only one germ-free and economical alternative to addressing the employee satisfaction issue. See if you can locate it on this list:
EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ALTERNATIVES 1. Increase salaries. 2. Improve the working environment. 3. Do an employee satisfaction survey and ignore the results.
Choice 3 is the correct answer. But be careful how you design the employee satisfaction survey. If you allow the employees to say what's really bothering them, they might expect you to change something; i.e., expect you to do work, and that would pretty much hose all the benefits of this approach. ... If your employees are fixated on selfish short-term goals such as food, shelter, and happiness, that is exactly the time when skilful manage- ment is most needed. Your challenge is to convince the employees to focus on long-term goals, such as their manager's career. ---
I do like the gang of Daniel Kahneman, Dan Ariely, Mark Twain, etc. But, I prefer to read their books by far. |
OFFENDERS WILL BE TERMINATED
|
|
|
 |
 AndyM
|
|
Total Posts: 2337 |
Joined: Mar 2004 |
|
|
Why??! What possessed you? |
I used to be disgusted; now I try to be amused... |
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
I was driven by the curiosity. |
OFFENDERS WILL BE TERMINATED
|
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Hacking For Beginners – Manthan Desai
The guy knows even less than I do. And tries to promote himself, his site, Vishnu and himself.
Most of the stuff there is about Windows XP. (The book is written in 2010)
One of the most daring stuff was to rename crap.exe to rose.jpg. Well, a turd by any other name will stink just as bad. Avoid. |
OFFENDERS WILL BE TERMINATED
|
|
 |
 Cheng
|
|
Total Posts: 2870 |
Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
Didn't you read the Amazon reviews ? Or is it some kind of masochistic pleasure that drives you to wade through this stuff ? |
"Don't try to run there's no way to survive / A vicious surrender I'll eat you alive / No one is safe until I get my fill / All hear my warning I'm king of the kill"
|
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Is that shit sold on Amazon? I found it through quite a circuitous route. Didn't bother to check it's presence there.
> Or is it some kind of masochistic pleasure that drives you to wade through this stuff
There is a bit of that, true. But the Amazon reviews aren't extremely informative either. No, sahib.
< EDIT > I can't say that this thread is often updated. |
OFFENDERS WILL BE TERMINATED
|
|
 |
 jslade
|
|
Total Posts: 1243 |
Joined: Feb 2007 |
|
|
"But the Amazon reviews aren't extremely informative either. No, sahib."
The secret to useful amazon reviews; find someone who is good at it and ignore everyone else. For example, NP's own Bachelier is pretty good:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A3CKPNSGA7JOLK/ |
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." |
|
|
 |
 Rashomon
|
|
Total Posts: 215 |
Joined: Mar 2011 |
|
|
As is NP's own Aaron Brown. |
"My hands are small, I know, but they're not yours, they are my own. And they're, not yours, they are my own." ~ Jewel |
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Shantaram by Roberts. "Based on true story" (My ass.)
There are 500 5 stars reviews and 50 one star reviews on Amazon. Go figure.
SubHessian remake of some or another original book. A cool ex-heroin addict finding an enlightenment at India within 900 pages of bad prose.
Avoid. Even if you are stuck in a desert plane with no other book. Better read safety instructions.
Disclaimer: Hermann Hesse is a great writer. |
OFFENDERS WILL BE TERMINATED
|
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
This year winner is The Truth by Neil Strauss.
An Odyssey of a guy who wanted to work out how to be faithful to his Ingrid (This one?)
 ( New Frankeistein 1974) I was skimming over sort of hot excerpts about orgies in Paris. (Hi, Nonius!) so decided to try the whole shit. Naw, avoid.
Some nice one liners, like this one
> Then again, no matter what your point of view may be, you can > always find someone with a Ph.D to support it most probably stolen. That's it.
I doubt it's veracity, I disliked its characters. I learned nothing. And, yes, he comes back to his Solveig.
It's funny how there are definite circles of celebrities hanging (and jerking) together, and often, you like the guy (say, Sam Harris) you like the guys he likes (Christopher Hitchens and so on).
Being naturally curious, I started widening the net, and got interested in Tim Ferriss (do not read his books!) and the gang he interviews (like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Adam Scott), but the rest of his gang as a whole sucks. They just promote each other and themselves (Mutual Admiration Society.)
Neil is just one of these fakers. The fucker.
I do have a winner for the other category. But haven't finished it yet. |
I saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought 'what did you expect?
There's no water 'round here stupid, shoulda stayed where it was wet.'
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
The Dice man by Rhinefart.
You have got everything in it. Sex, drugs, and psychoanalysis.
The premise, the protagonist (psychoanalyst) decides to spice up his life by introducing the randomness by throwing (up) the dice. And so it goes. Cliché after cliché after cliché... I was interested whether it will work out into some twist. No. Never. Only if when writing the book the author were using the dice himself, it might have salvaged something.
By the way, if you haven't read the short story by Borges, "Lottery of Babylon." I implore you to do it now.
|
I saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought 'what did you expect?
There's no water 'round here stupid, shoulda stayed where it was wet.'
|
|
|
 |
 Dizzy
|
|
Total Posts: 255 |
Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
pj: I haven't read the book, but at least it is said to have inspired some decent 80s music, if nothing else. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cT3I_dlnNHE
|
"Although the code snippet makes taking over the earth look fairly easy, you don't see all the hard work going on behind the scenes."
- Programming F#, Chris Smith |
|
 |
 polysena
|
|
Total Posts: 1064 |
Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
Ah pj I disagree with you on the Dice man, which I found interesting as a thought experiment.. pushes serendipity to its extreme. I have heard that the author has lived his life by these standards and even created something like a "group" of followers. Read the article telegraph on George Cockcroft " But now The Dice Man is selling more copies than ever before. "Yes, and it is in print in more countries now. It is very strange. But it is still a cult book and not a best-selling book. It sells enough to make the publishers happy.""
By the way I had read Borges before and liked very much. And agreed pj at times the book is a bit boring or.. but still fascinating about "surrending to the power of fate in an absolute"... "Does he still consult the dice?
"At my age I am too stuck in the mud to use it for what young people should and do use it for. On the other hand, in theory, I have liberated myself . . . and there is not much left to discover." "
Poly |
Свобода - это то, что у меня внутри.
(Ленинград и Кипелов - "Свобода")
Кому то очень больно, а кому то заебись (Серебряная свадьба) |
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Dean Radin's Supernormal.
Who doesn't want to believe (for youngsters it is X-Files reference.) I do. So I plunged in there.
Somehow, I was reminded of quip by Henri Broch about the diminishing of psi powers in history. We had moving Easter Island statues, then chairs, then bending spoons, and now we try to see the results in the quantum level.
Exact! Here Dean presents the single photon quantum entanglement experiments. Which were analyzed unmercifully in here.
My two cents. The quantum entanglement phenomenon does not require a living consciousness! A device can be used just as successfully, you, moron. 
Further on the author argues that since there are zillions of recorded paranormal phenomena (UFOs, crop circles (!) etc.) there must be something in that. Yeah, since are thousands of three dollar bills circulating around, some of them should be acceptable in Wall Mart. Aslo some intriguing anecdotes. Which are, as he stresses himself, anecdotes.
What bugged me most was a bait-n-switch technique. For example he talks about levitation and then he presents the meta-analysis for the feeling of being stared at. What?
As the aforementioned reviewer said, if he weren't reaching for the stars, maybe there would be some genuine dollar bills lying around.
Finally, my conclusions were: If the book has an endorsement by Deepak Chopra, avoid.
< EDIT > Previously a part of my rant has been eaten by Cthulhu (or a Phat Phinger Monster.) |
I saw a dead fish on the pavement and thought 'what did you expect?
There's no water 'round here stupid, shoulda stayed where it was wet.'
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Change agent by David Suarez. So called BioPunk classics (of 2017) Wooden characters, linear plot (with one(!) twist.), totally misunderstood CRISPER technology and the changes that it would have be bringing (not sure what tense to use, maybe Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional?).
Nothing thought through. Like at the start he is talking about a arch-secret technology used only by one arch-villain, and a short time after (at the end of the book) it is used by various sheiks to model their slaves into Brad Pitts and Scarlet Johanssons (in 2044 !). So either the technology is breathtakingly fast, and Hollywood is breathtakingly conservative, or it is one more of the numerous holes in the plot.
BioPunk, my ass... I can write better, after thinking the things over more carefully though.
Yes, SciFi is in deep crisis.
|
The older I grow, the more I distrust the familiar doctrine that age brings wisdom
Henry L. Mencken |
|
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Jordan Peterson 12 rules for life. I plodded through the first four of them:
1) stiff upper lip 2) masturbate 3) never help strangers 4) masturbate in front of the mirror
Deepak Chopra has no chance against this ultimate deepity producer. Like "Man is order, woman is chaos" (tell it to my wife when she makes me put my socks in order.)
I liked a bit about lobsters (didn't dare to check the sources though.) But the eminent author totally screwed up about chimpanzees (apparently read the wrong article from his wife's OhLaLa magazine.)
Avoid. Utter tosh.
|
The older I grow, the more I distrust the familiar doctrine that age brings wisdom
Henry L. Mencken |
|
 |
 chiral3
|
Founding Member |
Total Posts: 5207 |
Joined: Mar 2004 |
|
|
I tried to get through Taleb's latest piece of shit. For a guy with no skin in any game he certainly has a bunch to say.
I'll give Taleb this: he was a visionary in anticipating the anti-intellectual and divisive climate, particularly in the US. For him to anticipate that writing a baseless and meandering book that basically indicts,..., well, everyone, was brilliant. He could get a job writing policy. |
Nonius is Satoshi Nakamoto. 物の哀れ |
|
|
 |
 Cheng
|
|
Total Posts: 2870 |
Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
Scott Adams "Win bigly" [sic]. He keeps explaining why Trump is a "master persuader" (I would say manipulator but that is probably nitpickery on my end) which is a bit tedious but ok. What really cracks me up are the interludes where he tries to show off what a f*cking genius he is ("When you read this paragraph I mesmerized you"... well... actually I didn't read every single word so I missed the important point). Unfortunately there are too many of them and the book found its way back on the staple where it will remain for some more time. |
"He's man, he's a kid / Wanna bang with you / Headbanging man" (Grave Digger, Headbanging Man) |
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
Hi Cheng,
I need to apologize. I read the book, thought 'meh', and went my merry ways. I should have warned you that you, being European, aren't in his target group and his mind tricks won't work on you. The proof: they hadn't. 
And your post is the living proof for the usefulness of the thread. |
The older I grow, the more I distrust the familiar doctrine that age brings wisdom
Henry L. Mencken |
|
|
 |
 Cheng
|
|
Total Posts: 2870 |
Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
It is probably my fault that his tricks didn't work on me since my reading style involves skipping words here and there... 
What annoys me, though, is that I read his last book "How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big", thought *meh* and still fell for the next one. Old habits die hard and it needs more that one mediocre (not to say crappy) book to change them... |
"He's man, he's a kid / Wanna bang with you / Headbanging man" (Grave Digger, Headbanging Man) |
|
 |
 pj
|
|
Total Posts: 3604 |
Joined: Jun 2004 |
|
|
For anyone to thinks of reading Scott Adams Looserthink, don't.
Paraphrasing the old dictum, there are important facts, new facts, and, miscellaneous facts in the book.
The important facts, that people are biased and irrational, and what to do with that are now quite " à la mode" and are much much better covered by Kanehman, Ariely, Yudkowsky, McRaney etc etc.
Go there.
I am skipping the self help part of the book, since I don't buy into it. (sorry)
The new facts are: Adams has a paruresis (i.e. shy bladder), had his periscope endorsed by the husband of Kardashian, and is Twitter active.
Here you have the summary of the whole book.
In general, it is always a bit fascinating to watch a guy getting unhinged in real time.
He had some interesting ideas in his own time. Is quite a demagogue ( "false analogy" is his forte), and oh so full of himself.
Sad.
Ah, and a miscellaneous fact, he is a trained hypnotist.
Warning, don't engage "in mind reading" as proposed at your own risk.
@Cheng, I hope I am not too late this time.
|
The older I grow, the more I distrust the familiar doctrine that age brings wisdom
Henry L. Mencken |
|
|
 |