Forums  > Books & Papers  > espen haug unified revolution  
     
Page 11 of 11Goto to page: 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11 Prev
Display using:  

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-04-20 16:55
"Not interested.
Sorry, EGH"

I think no one expected that you could Dance! in particular not to electronic dance music, so dont worry, we will not make the dance hit for u my dear...

quantie


Total Posts: 909
Joined: Jun 2004
 
Posted: 2021-04-22 10:51
@nikol will check it out

nikol


Total Posts: 1388
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2021-04-22 14:03
@quantie - it is just one specific implementation. one can find more, i think.

... What is a man
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? (c)

kavya986
Banned

Total Posts: 23
Joined: May 2021
 
Posted: 2021-05-28 17:18
Hyderabad female escorts are among the best escorts you'll get in Hyderabad and not only are they really superbly beautiful and stunning girls, they'd really like to fulfil your needs by doing everything they could to sensually re-establish you.
Hyderabad escorts

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-09-30 00:16
"Albert’s negative attitude towards relativistic mass can perhaps cause a weakness in the foundation of general relativity theory. For example, our new theory matches fully up with all the properties of the Planck scale in relation to the mathematical properties of micro black holes, not only mathematically but also logically, something we demonstrate clearly that it is not the case of general relativity theory. "

Three Dimensional Space-Time Gravitational Metric, 3 Space + 3 Time Dimensions

Taking into account relativistic mass one no longer need Dark Energy (FakeEnergy) (other paper)
Wormholes are no longer mathematical possible, and wormhole physics and predictions are just absurd.
Planck scale fit. Considerably about it in this short paper.
New equation for cosmos, curvature constant falls out etc. Replacing Friedmann equation....(Forthcoming, soon in press!).

Expanding space, wormholes, dont make me laugh! Ignorance of relativistic mass has led to series of nonsense predictions with absurd interpretations! Relativistic mass first correctly described by Lorentz 1899. Albert got relativistic mass predictions wrong in the end of his most famous 1905 paper, and no one talk about his relativistic mass formulas today. Modern books if mention relativistic mass at all, mentions the Lorentz 1899 (transverse) formula, but typically without mentioning Lorentz or where the formula came from. And when jumping on Minkowski space-time Albert abandoned relativistic mass. His followers (in particular self proclaimed GR experts) where and still are allergic to relativistic mass and never really researched what kind of theory they would get if implementing relativistic mass in gravity theory. Then they would get a theory making logical sense that fit observations.

(PS typo second line from bottom in EQ 8, the powered to 2 should not be there, end result is naturally correct! My secretary must have messed it up.)

Back to Techno Music Here! no time for comments! Please NO COMMENTS (before dawn)!





nikol


Total Posts: 1388
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2021-09-30 16:28
GR becomes too easy for some. Just abandon conservation laws.
.
https://dailygazette.com/2021/09/25/did-niskayuna-man-solve-mystery-of-the-universe-he-thinks-so/

... What is a man
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? (c)

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-10-01 12:12
" Just abandon conservation laws."

I doubt theories not consistent with conservation of mass-energy (over cosmic scales) can be consistent. My model is 100% consistent with conservation of energy-mass over closed system (thought experiment) and in reality over the size of the universe!

Interesting is conservation of momentum in standard physics. So momentum for anything with mass is given by

m*v*gamma

what happen with the momentum when v=0? the momentum is zero for rest mass particles, also the de Broglie wavelength calculated from the standard momentum is then not even mathematically defined, as means dividing by zero.

Standard momentum do not even exist, have anyone measured m*v? No, one has only measured the mass (relative mass actually only in standard theory) in form of the kilograms of the mass for example, and one can naturally measure the velocity of the mass, then multiply these two measures together, this is not the same as observing momentum.

But they tricked it to be partly correct by introducing fourth momentum, where suddenly the time component (because they do not want to admit it fudge because they dont have rest-mass momentum), as E/c (where E=mc^2). Still they do not even have a valid time operator in standard physics, they cannot even agree on if Heisenberg's Energy time uncertainty principle can be derived, they are lost, they do not know what mass is (collision-time), until then they have to invent obscure time operators to try to fudge, such as external clocks outside the physical system (as suggested in one paper).

No no no, we cannot measure m*v, what we can measure is the impact from moving m, and that is the Compton momentum, that is identical to energy in collision-space time. Well there is only collision-time and collision-length, but yes we can make many mathematical functions of these, and then come up with fancy names such as momentum, energy...but, sorry not needed!

Standard momentum is just a derivative of something real, better to go straight to the real observable to make a simpler theory. Standard momentum is directly linked to de Broglie wavelength that also just is a derivative of something real. The Compton wavelength is the real matter "wavelength"

de Broglie wavelength that goes toward infinity as v gets close to zero, and not even is mathematically defined for v=0 has led to absurd suggestions in literature, such as the electron is everywhere in the whole universe or that the de Broglie wavelength is some wave-package... Who do they think they are fooling? Well everyone except me likely ;-) Well the de Broglie wavelength is a wave-package, it is a pure mathematical wave that can be derived from a real matter wavelength, the Compton wavelength.

The 1927 experiments did not at all confirm the de Broglie wavelength, they just confirmed wavelike properties in mass, that can be fully and better explained by the Compton wavelength.




nikol


Total Posts: 1388
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2021-10-02 15:09
> what happen with the momentum when v=0?

What Newton would say? Is there absolute v=0? Cool

... What is a man
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? (c)

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-10-02 17:01
"What Newton would say? Is there absolute v=0?"

yes the most important of all velocities. Most important for the Planck mass particles that has a maximum velocity of v=0. And it dose not even break with Lorenz symmetry I think.

The Planck mass particle velocity (speed) is always v=0. It is just as important as the speed of light is c.

I have coined it the Planck Speed in a unfinished draft I will put out in not so long, but already mentioned this speed in some of my papers (but now I coin it Planck Speed), but this one will have main focus only on the Planck speed.

The Planck Speed is the missing speed in modern physics. It is the second face of light so to say. We live in a sandwich between 0 and c. The sandwich model of the universe!

The Planck speed is ALWAYS 0 = ZERO! It is related to Newtons Absolute time idea. For anything with mass




A Planck mass particle has reduced Compton wavelenght equal to the Planck length, so it's MAXIMUM speed is Zero. Sounds not logical, but it is! Try Absolute Vodka to understand this Absolute Zero Speed!

Comments are welcome with or without Absolute V.

nikol


Total Posts: 1388
Joined: Jun 2005
 
Posted: 2021-10-03 08:46
Absolute Vodka is real, Absolute speed = 0 is not, sorry. 😀

... What is a man
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? (c)

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-10-03 08:56
why not? because your daddy says so?

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-10-31 10:18
A New equation for the Universe! Replacing the Freidmann Equation!

This is the H universe:



sorry the Friedmann universe do not exist, it is only a toy model that predicts too low universe mass, and strange constants that falls out of the derivations when taking into account relativistic mass that was abandoned by Albert and the general relativity community without first proper investigate what Lorentz 1899 relativistic mass could lead to.

Let there be light! (On the universe models)

EGH


Total Posts: 130
Joined: Nov 2014
 
Posted: 2021-11-18 17:55
Quantum Cosmology, only two constants needed to predict all observable gravity phenomena and (the correct) cosmology (+ variable, like distance to observation)

If u not belive me u have to walk the Planck!



Previous Thread :: Next Thread 
Page 11 of 11Goto to page: 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11 Prev